https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41435 Wed 03 Aug 2022 14:26:31 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:22920 Thu 27 Jan 2022 15:57:23 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10827 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:12:50 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:5810 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:44:55 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30134 N = 178) participating in a healthy lifestyles study comparing a telephone versus face-to-face delivered intervention. Therapeutic alliance was assessed using the Agnew Relationship Measure; primary outcomes were treatment retention and changes in symptoms and health behaviors. Contrary to expectations, early alliance did not predict treatment retention. However, elements of both client- and therapist-rated alliance predicted some clinical outcomes (e.g., higher confidence in the therapeutic alliance at session 1 predicted improvements in 12-month depression). Some modest interactions between early alliance and intervention condition were also identified (e.g., clients initially with lower self-perceived initiative, or higher therapist-perceived bonding benefited preferentially from the telephone-delivered intervention), highlighting the need to further examine the interplay between therapeutic alliance and treatment modality.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:39:12 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:33350 Fri 19 Oct 2018 12:56:50 AEDT ]]>